IMO, the "Are the Wizards better without John Wall" question misses the point

Completely agree with this @SBNation / @BulletsForever article about the Wizards “without John Wall”:

> ”Asking whether the team is better without Wall misses the mark. What’s more important here is that this is the best team he’s ever played on, and that bodes well for the Wizards’ immediate and long-term future.”

[≠]